Anybody that wants to refer us to legal experts for an international opinion (we are looking in Holland ourselves). Questions raised are: 1. What do you do if you believe your life or that of people you care about is threatened but you can's convince authorities (the police) to take action. 2. How far can a person go if the threat is complex, slow, international, legal. 3. What is the implication in terms of protection of other people in disabling a device, aparatus, vehicle, machine that is considered a mortal threat if it does not direcly involve anybody (secretly taking the bullets out of a gun owned by a threatening person f.i.). How is this considered an act of 'other' defence? More here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwRSHuuYrNY